Prof.Abdelhamid Fouda
==========================
Here, we will briefly discuss the theories concerned with semantics.
1. The Theory of Naming; This theory, explained in Plato‟s dialogue Cratylus maintains that language is a
communication system which works with two elements; the signifier, and the signified. Plato says that the signifier is a
word in the language and the signified is the object in the world that it „stands for‟ or „refers to‟. Thus, according to this
theory words and things are directly related. Traditional grammar was based on the assumption that the word was the
basic unit of syntax and semantics. The word was a „sign‟ composed of two parts, or components: the form (signifier)
and its meaning (signified).
There are some difficulties with this view, however. Firstly, it seems to apply to some nouns only. You may locate the
signified (object) which the signifier (word) „chair‟ refers to. However, there are some nouns which do not refer to
objects in this world: examples are Unicorn and Raxsh (Rostam‟s special horse in the Iranian epic written by Ferdousi).
Secondly, there are other nouns that do not refer to physical objects at all. Thus, what are the objects which love and
hatred refer to? Thirdly, with a noun we can draw a picture of the object that is denoted (referred to). But this is
impossible with verbs. How should we show run, hesitate, and annoy? The same problem remains regarding adjectives
and adverbs, as well.
2. The Conceptual Theory of Meaning: In the theory of meaning, just explained, words and things are directly related.
But in the conceptual theory of meaning words and things are related through the mediation of concepts of the mind.
Ogden and Richards (1923) saw this relationship as a triangle:
Thought (or Reference or Meaning or Concept)
the symbol = the linguistic element; the word, phrase, sentence
the referent = the object in the world
thought or reference = concept
Thus, according to this theory there is no direct link between the symbol and referent – the link is through reference
or thought (our concepts). The problem with this view is that we do not precisely know the nature of the link or bond
between symbol and concept.
The conceptual theory of meaning or mentalistic theory is maintained by Chomsky. He believes that intuition and
introspection must play a crucial part in our investigation of language.
3. The Behavioristic Theory of Meaning: The term context of situation is used by two scholars, first by an
anthropologist called Malinowski, and later by a British linguist called Firth. Both of these scholars stated meaning in
terms of the context in which language is used. These two maintained that the description of a language is not complete
without some reference to the context of situation in which the language operated. A more extreme view sees the
meaning of the linguistic elements AS the situation in which the word is used. Bloomfield, the structuralist, maintained
this behavioristic view. He explained his view through his famous account of Jack and Jill.
As we know, Bloomfield is a follower of Skinner‟s school of psychology called behaviorism. However, Skinner‟s
model has been severely criticized by Chomsky, a proponent of the conceptual theory of meaning.
No comments:
Post a Comment